Monday, 29 February 2016







How are you all? 

I shall be continuing from my last post. 

Firstly, I will discuss some anti-Mawlid arguments.




Sheikh Assim al-Hakeem in the following video
explains why Muslim should not celebrate the Mawlid 
  • One of the main arguments used is that the Prophet never celebrated Mawlid, neither did his companions. So why should we?
  • The practice of Mawlid is an innovation and the Prophet forbade (bidah) innovation. Aisha (the Prophet's wife) reported that the Prophet stated "whoever introduces into this religion of ours something that we have not commanded it is to be rejected".
  • The Prophet also stated “every (kul) innovation is a misguidance”. Therefore, the festival of Mawlid is haram and unacceptable and those who celebrate it will be punished in the hereafter. 


Certainly, some interesting points made by the anti-Mawlid party, read further to find out some of the pro-Mawlid arguments.



One of the main argument presented by those who celebrate the festival of Mawlid is that: -
·   The Prophet was born on a Monday and he used to celebrate his birth by fasting on Mondays.
Shaykh Muhammad al-Husayni al-Ninowy 
briefly explains why the Mawlid is permissible.


·   Verse 10:58 “Say: ‘In (this) bounty (fadl) of God and in His grace (rahma) - in this then, let them rejoice: it is better than all (the worldly wealth) that they may amass!" is used by the pro-Mawlid party, in order to justify the practice of celebrating the Prophet’s birthday. It is considered that the word rahma in this verse refers to Prophet Muhammad, which Allah has commanded to rejoice. The pro-Mawlid party deduce that the word rahma refers to Prophet Muhammad because the Prophet is referred to rahma in numerous verses in the Qur’an such as in verses 3:164, 21:107 “and We have sent you (oh Muhammad) but as a Mercy (rahma) for Mankind” (21:107).

·      Not all innovations are prohibited as there are two types of innovations good and bad.

Shaykh Giles Sadek describes in a short video the 
notion of the two types of innovations
     

·         Bidah is split further into five categories and Mawlid is a bidah hasanah (good).

  Bid'ah and Mawlid - Sheikh Abdal Hakim
 Murad explains that Mawlid is good bidah
                                                       




    ·  The pro-Mawlid party explain that not everything which has been invented after the demise of the Prophet is unacceptable such  as Hajj visas, and the use of hotels in Makkah and Medina,  alarm clocks, phones, laptops and driving a car etc. According to the principles of Islamic jurisprudence a practice can only be classified as being prohibited, if it opposes the Qur’an or either the Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad or the Shariah (Islamic Law). They also consider that the celebration of the Prophet's birthday "has its roots in the Shariah".

Definitely, some thought-provoking points made by the pro-Mawlid party also. 

One thing which can be noticed is the clear difference in how bidah is defined by both parties. 
  • The anti-Mawlid party argue that innovation is bad and unacceptable and because Mawlid is an innovative practice it is impermissible. 
  • Whereas, the pro-Mawlid party consider that there is a twofold definition of bidah, there is good and bad innovation and Mawlid is a good innovation.


I'm just going to take a break and have a

 
and I shall return soon with a post on how
 this debate creates disunity within
the Muslim community.
 




Thursday, 25 February 2016


Above is a picture of al-Maqrizi
I didn't know much about the history of the Mawlid before I started researching about the practice. To my surprise I realised that the celebration is understood to have been originally practised by the Shiite Fatimid dynasty in Egypt. But the exact date of when the practice was initiated is unknown. The earliest account of a Mawlid celebration is dated back to the year 517/1123 which has been documented by al-Maqrizi (d.845/1442). It is understood that whilst the practice of celebrating the Prophet's birthday became more and more popular it also received criticism from a small number of Muslims scholars such as Taj al-Din al-Fakihani and Ibn Taymiyya

The objection of this festival came in the form of fatwas (which are the opinions of scholars on a point of law). Equally, fatwas were also issued by Muslim scholars who defended the practice as being acceptable. For example, by al-Suyuti and Ibn Hajar


A quick history lesson. I hope you guys haven't 
gone to sleep as I use to during my history lessons. Lol.

 


 
In the past Muslim scholars expressed their opinion
through fatwas declaring what is permissible
and impermissible,
but in contemporary times, anybody and everybody has the
 ease and accessibility of using the social media to express
 how they feel about any topic at their fingertips.




The topic of Mawlid is no different. 

For those of you who are thinking what is all the fuss about?

 What are the arguments presented by those who oppose or accept the practice of Mawlid? 


I will mention some of the anti-Mawlid and pro-Mawlid arguments which can be found on the social media in the next post.









Hi everyone, I will be discussing one of the most controversial issues in Islam, the festival of celebrating Prophet Muhammad's birthday (Mawlid un-Nabi/Mawlid/Eid Milad un-Nabi). I thought I might as well focus on this topic seeing as it is the time of the year when the Prophet's birthday is celebrated by the majority of Muslims. Also, especially after I had attended a Mawlid gathering last week, proceeding the event I met up with family and friends and when I started discussing the festival it sparked up a big argument....... and I was like


It was too late when I realised that I should have just kept my mouth


                   
            SHUT 
However, I can say with 100% conviction (well maybe nearly 100%) that this is not the first time an argument over the practice of Mawlid had taken place. It has become more prominent that whenever it comes around to this period, arguments flare up surrounding the issue of whether the practice is permissible or not. It is sad to see that this debate has certainly created a great division amongst Muslims. On the one hand there are those who argue that the celebration is unacceptable. On the other hand, it is disputed by Muslims that Mawlid un-Nabi is a permissible practice in Islam.




The festival of Prophet Muhammad's birthday is often celebrated around the 12th of Rabi al-Awwal (the third month in the Islamic calendar). Forty-seven Muslim countries around the world declare a public holiday on the day this festival is celebrated. During this celebration cities, mosques and homes are decorated.

The celebration is a joyous event in which people gather together and venerate the Prophet, by reciting the Prophet’s seerah (biography), the Qur'an, salatul al-nabi (invocation of blessings upon the Prophet) and sing naats (poetry).
 
Below is a beautiful poem in English which
illustrates the love for Prophet Muhammad.


 

This is a photo of people gathering together
in Bangladesh for a Mawlid procession.

Above is a video of naat singing by Qibla Sahib Eidgah Sharif in a Mawlid un-Nabi gathering in Amsterdam, Holland.

Muslims celebrate this festival by fasting, giving money to charities, and langars (communal meals) are organised. Mawlid processions  also take place all over the world.